The Role of Workplace Psychogeography in Improving Accounting Employee Cognitive Productivity in the Post-Pandemic Era

Main Article Content

Husnul Hadi
Husnul Azmi Muhayyan

Abstract

The transformation of work patterns following the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced the operational dynamics of accounting organizations, particularly in relation to workspace arrangements and employee cognitive performance. In the era of hybrid work systems and increasing analytical demands, accounting employees are required to maintain high levels of concentration, accuracy, and decision-making capability. However, the role of workplace psychogeography in supporting accounting employee productivity remains underexplored in accounting and management studies. This study aims to analyze the influence of workplace psychogeography on the cognitive productivity of accounting employees in the post-pandemic era. The research employed a quantitative correlational design involving 285 accounting employees working in accounting firms, financial departments, auditing companies, and professional service organizations across major cities in Indonesia. Psychogeographic variables consisted of workspace layout perception, natural lighting, spatial privacy, access to open spaces, and emotional workplace atmosphere. Cognitive productivity was measured through indicators of analytical focus, critical thinking ability, financial problem-solving capacity, and task completion efficiency. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression. The findings revealed that workplace psychogeography significantly influenced the cognitive productivity of accounting employees (R² = 0.47; p < 0.001). Natural lighting and spatial privacy emerged as the most dominant predictors contributing to improved concentration and reduced mental fatigue during accounting-related tasks. Employees working in adaptive and psychologically supportive workspaces demonstrated higher cognitive performance compared to those in static and enclosed environments. The study confirms that workplace design has become an important managerial strategy in accounting organizations to maintain employee productivity, accuracy, and well-being in the post-pandemic era. The findings provide implications for accounting management practices by emphasizing the integration of human resource management, workspace design, and organizational psychology in developing sustainable accounting work environments.

Article Details

Section

Artikel

References

Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2022). Remote work reconsidered: Managing cognitive productivity and employee performance in hybrid organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(5), 712–728. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2598

Debord, G. (1955). Introduction to a critique of urban geography. Les Lèvres Nues. https://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/presitu/geography.html

Golembiewski, J. (2019). Neuroarchitecture and the workplace: The impact of spatial design on employee cognition and well-being. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(4), 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.001

Jones, P. (2017). Space, affect, and organization: Understanding workplace environments through psychogeography. Organization Studies, 38(3–4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655495

Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2018). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Biophilic+Design-p-9780470163344

Li, Y., & Robertson, M. M. (2022). The influence of physical workplace conditions on cognitive performance in hybrid work environments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8675. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148675

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2022). Cognitive productivity and employee performance in dynamic organizational environments. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 521–556. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0123

Oksanen, K., & Ståhle, P. (2013). Physical environment as a source for innovation: Investigating the attributes of innovative space. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2013-0136

Pinder, D. (2005). Visions of the city: Utopianism, power and politics in twentieth-century urbanism. Edinburgh University Press. https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-visions-of-the-city.html

Rieck, A., & Kelter, J. A. (2021). Workspace flexibility and employee cognitive engagement in contemporary organizations. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 23(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-01-2021-0004

Sailer, K., McCulloh, I., Pemberton, M., & Scheider, S. (2019). Workplace design and cognitive performance: The role of spatial configuration and visual comfort. Environment and Behavior, 51(3), 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738078

Söderström, O. (2020). Psychogeography and emotional experiences in organizational spaces. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 102(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2020.1727073

Van der Voordt, T., & Jensen, P. A. (2021). The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity, and well-being. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 23(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-08-2020-0033

Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290